Rita Hayworth calls Fred Astaire’s bluff. Image: Giphy
We might as well get the Unpleasantness out of the way.
The Unpleasantness is in the musical comedy, You’ll Never Get Rich (1941), a film about a New York musical stage director (Fred Astaire) who receives a draft notice from the U.S. Army. This notice couldn’t come at a Better Time; it’s the answer to all his troubles.
Just what are Astaire’s troubles? We’re glad you asked.
First, he’s tasked with directing a musical number with multiple female dancers who adore him. Unhappily for them, he’s Very Busy and has No Time for romance.
Second, his boss (Robert Benchley) is a wealthy producer and notorious womanizer. He buys a diamond bracelet for one of the dancers, only to have it discovered by his wife (Frieda Inescort). He tells Inescort that Astaire bought the bracelet for one of the dancers – yeah, that’s it – and he’s keeping it safe, like the great pal he is.
Third, if Astaire wants to stay employed, he has to pretend he’s madly in love with the Dancer in Question.
Lastly, the dancer at the centre of all this is Rita Hayworth. Astaire’s character won’t admit it, but her very presence threatens to upset his regimented existence.
Now, you may be thinking none of this sounds Unpleasant, and it isn’t. The problem is with Hayworth: She’s talented and funny, and criminally underused in this film.
You’ll Never Get Rich should be titled Fred Astaire Joins the Army. Now, we don’t begrudge Astaire his starring role – he is Fred Astaire, after all – and his joining the army is amusing indeed.
But the far more interesting thing here is the diamond bracelet that keeps resurfacing, and Hayworth’s reaction each time she sees it.
The first time Hayworth is given the bracelet is in Benchley’s office. It’s an extravagant gift, especially considering Benchley can’t remember her name, but she’ll have No Part of this. She slips the bracelet into the pocket of his overcoat as she leaves his office.
The next time she sees the bracelet is later that evening, at a swanky nightclub. She’s there at Astaire’s invitation, but doesn’t realize Astaire only trying to fool Benchley’s suspicious wife. When Astaire presents Hayworth with the diamond bracelet, she realizes she’s been Set Up.
She’s no fool. Before she opens the bracelet box, Hayworth says, with exaggerated innocence, “It couldn’t be a diamond bracelet, could it?” After she opens it, she plants a big kiss on Astaire’s cheek, then collects her coat and handbag – and leaves the bracelet behind.
Hayworth is nothing but exuberant in this scene, and when she leaves it, she takes all the sparkle with her, leaving us with Astaire and his army shenanigans.
Astaire gives Hayworth a tutorial. Image: Alamy
Hayworth had been in acting in Hollywood since 1934, when she was 16 year-old Rita Cansino. She was under contract to Fox Film Corporation (which later became Twentieth Century Fox), but it wasn’t until she signed a contract with Columbia Pictures that she became a Star.
Actually, it wasn’t until she changed her last name to Hayworth (her mother’s maiden name) and changed her hairline via electrolysis, that she became a Star.
According to Wikipedia, You’ll Never Get Rich was one of the most expensive films Columbia Pictures had made to date. “The picture was so successful,” says Wikipedia, “the studio produced and released another Astaire-Hayworth picture the following year, You Were Never Lovelier.“
Hayworth and Astaire have real on-screen chemistry; their banter and dancing are a joy to watch. In fact, Wikipedia quotes Astaire as saying Hayworth was his favourite dance partner.
Which is why this film can be a little frustrating. Hayworth is clearly capable of a bigger, more complex role, but this is not That Film.
If you haven’t seen Fred Astaire paired with Rita Hayworth, You’ll Never Get Rich is a good example of their chemistry. You just have to promise not to be too disappointed by Hayworth’s limited role.
This post is part of the 100 YEARS OF RITA HAYWORTH BLOGATHON hosted by Love Letters to Old Hollywood.
You’ll Never Get Rich: starring Fred Astaire, Rita Hayworth, Robert Benchley. Directed by Sidney Lanfield. Written by Michael Fessier & Ernest Pagano. Columbia Pictures, 1941, B&W, 88 mins.
Silver Screenings 
I’ve never seen this, but with your description of the the lack o’ Rita, I don’t think I’ll be bumping it up on my must-see list any time soon! LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rita is fab for the first 20 minutes, then the film turns into Fred Astaire I The Army
LikeLike
Ack! Premature send. Doh! Anyway, Rita gets demoted to The Girl Who’s Marrying Someone Else, which is a real shame.
LikeLike
This little film is such a pleasure. And Rita is absolutely incandescent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t she lovely? Beautiful and charming – and very funny.
LikeLike
Lovely. I adore Rita Hayworth!
LikeLiked by 1 person
She was something special, wasn’t she? When she’s on the screen, it’s hard to notice anyone else!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yeah!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I’ve only ever seen this film once and it was a long time ago (when I was a teenager). I don’t remember anything about it, so I think it’s high time I watched it again. I know it aired on TCM last week, but I missed it 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be interesting to see what your impressions are, watching this film again now as an adult.
LikeLike
I love how you approached this film. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen it, but to be honest, I don’t remember being very impressed. Fred and Rita were marvelous, of course, but there was definitely something missing — you might be right in thinking that the problem lies with Rita being underused. I’ve been recording a lot of her movies to binge on this month and I’m curious to see if my feelings will change when I rewatch You’ll Never Get Rich.
Thanks for contributing to my blogathon! It wouldn’t have been the same without you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Thanks! I posted a bit early, because I couldn’t wait.
I’m curious to know if your thoughts on this film change after your Rita binge-watching this month. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
His favourite dancer more than Ginger Rodgers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can you believe it? Apparently, Rita could learn dances very, very quickly.
LikeLike
I always learn so much from your blog posts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Will definitely have to give this a watch as I love Fred Astaire
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fred is charming in this film, as he always is. It’s a must-see for Fred Astaire fans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did you see the movie The Band Wagon with him in it? It’s the only one I wasn’t totally a fan of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Band Wagon? *looks around, whispers* I’ve never seen that film… What was it about the film that left you underwhelmed?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm…. it’s hard to put my finger on it. I think it was a bit odd would be the best way to say it! Plus Astaire was a lot older in it and…. how can I put this… didn’t have the same appeal??? My humble opinion only, of course! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
An easy movie to skip large parts of while you hurry to get to Rita and the musical numbers. And I like Robert Benchley and Frieda Inescourt’s drollery, and can’t understand why it fell so flat here.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh yes – Robert Benchley and Frieda Inescort are superb. They’re also criminally under-used in this film. With all this talent, it’s a shame this film doesn’t live up to its potential.
LikeLike
A real looker that Rita….
LikeLiked by 1 person
You said it! I think she was one of the most beautiful actresses in old Hollywood
LikeLike
That’s why You Were Never Lovelier is so much better. It’s the silliest plot ever, but so much more Rita time…and the two together are so wonderful in it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup, you said it. The whole time I was watching this film, I kept wishing I’d chosen the other one instead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rita and Fred were magic together; I do remember the dance numbers are the most exciting part of this film. Rita was always treated as a lowly contract player at Columbia, even with the success of Cover Girl and Gilda a few years later, but even here, headlining a film with Astaire, she is a mere supporting player…
I think she has ore to do in their follow-up, You Were Never Lovelier…
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right, she has a larger role in You Were Never Lovelier. She’s an incredible dancer, no? Makes it look so easy. She’s terrific with Fred Astaire in all their scenes together.
LikeLike